home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news2.ios.com!usenet
- From: vlad@gramercy.ios.com (Vlastimil Adamovsky)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Mastering C++ (Visual C++ V4.0 vs. Borland C++ V4.5)
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 1996 04:15:41 GMT
- Organization: Internet Online Services
- Message-ID: <4ggpvm$mca@news2.ios.com>
- References: <00001a81+00009ec9@msn.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-61.ts-7.hck.idt.net
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- KMays@msn.com (Kenneth Mays) wrote:
-
- >Tell me - Do you think Borland C++ V4.5/5.0 is worth the money or do
- >you think Visual C++ V4.0 is the way to go? Please leave some
- >CONCRETE facts!!!!
-
- There are many C++ compilers. Neither one is perfect. As a consultant
- I have to use the compiler the clients "knows" is the best.
-
-
- *******************************************
- * Vlastimil Adamovsky *
- * Smalltalk, C++ and Envelop development *
- *******************************************
-
-